Return to the
Welcome Page

David Parker Presentation

  NZ Ministry for the Environment publications

 

Return to  Update Page

Return to presentation to NZ Minister of Energy & Climate Issues

 

 

 

This page contains examples of the education resources delivered into our schools by the NZ Climate Change Office*.

*Note: This office was expanded by the new Labour administration in 2000 so that its activities transcended  11 Government departments. This was to show the importance the Government placed on climate issues and the maintenance of our 100% Clean Green Image. It was subsumed into the Ministry for the Environment in 2003 though the Government finds it "convenient" to pretend the Office still exists.

Principle of energy: “When a symbol use works to deny change it will materially alter the potential of the universe (energy) in a way that results in a reduction in the capacity of the symbol user to mirror reality. When a symbol use works for the acceptance of change it will increase the capacity of the symbol user to mirror reality.”

Denials of change:

(1) The booklets suggest climate change is bad. It confuses the normal changing state of the universe with particular forms of change - in this case Human-induced Thermal Build-up of Earth's surface.

(2) The booklets evoke images of atmospheric processes as a greenhouse. The troposphere or mixing zone is characterised by a high capacity to transfer thermal energy by convection. Greenhouses are characterised by suppressed transfer of thermal energy by convection.

(3)The booklets deny the central issue which is that our carbon emissions increase thermal transfer by convection i.e. there are increased levels of change with greater risk of hurricanes, droughts and floods.

(4) The booklets obscure the role of water vapour in our experience of weather. They deny change in that water vapour is the dominant Warmer Trace Gas with a relative fast cycle (less than 14 days). Thus it is a critical agent of change.

(5) The booklets states that we can conserve energy which it defines as "using less energy". This is a double denial of the transformation or change properties that underpin the Principle of the Conservation of Change.

The booklets were titled Climate Change and were based around the following themes:

Earth is very slowly getting warmer.

Why is this happening?

Does it matter?

What can we do about it?

  General comment

Examples shown the Minister come from two booklets designed for Level 4 i.e. 11-12 year old students. As such they have optimal potential for reaching a wide range of the public. The contents are easy to read, framed with colourful illustrations and research shows that this level of communication is effective with many adults. This is because adults often lead busy, pressured lives and know that the information in such publications is designed for quick, easy digestion and will not place great demands on their time.

The pamphlets form the most authoritative introduction to the issue of the impact of human activity on atmosphere balances for many primary teachers. The coverage of the issue in the general media is confused and patently ignorant. These pamphlets represent Government authority on the subject.

  The booklets were published against a general background in which the Government was mainly concerned with protecting New Zealand ’s Clean Green Image for international marketing purposes and using the Climate Change Office to promote carbon trading as a means of maintaining the status quo re our carbon emissions. It did this by arguing to our business sector that our forest sinks enabled the nation to continue operating with “business as usual” and the nation could make “good money from carbon trading”.

As a result of this policy, investments in motorways, SUVs, Bulk-generated electricity from coal and Gas plants, larger and inefficient dwellings, air travel, dairy farming etc have caused an increase in carbon dioxide emissions of 39% since 1990. At the same time investment in rail, public transport, forests, dwelling based generation etc. has been relatively minimal.

  Late in 2005 it was revealed that New Zealand is now a net emitter i.e. our carbon emissions are greater than the ability of our carbon sinks (forests) to absorb carbon from the atmosphere.

Comment to Minister of Energy/Climate Change Issues:

The publication is based on the use of the greenhouse symbol of the atmosphere. The pamphlet says that so called scientists use the symbol. However there is no scientific evidence that supports this use. In fact the small amount of research done on this use of the greenhouse symbol indicates it does not work in conveying climate issues.

No mention is made of the fact that the issue revolves around our impact on the balances of trace gases.   

The air constituency statement by what the booklets calls " scientists" is nonsense.

It omits the “miracle gas” Argon (0.9% of the atmosphere and a child of ten can to the sums to show the figures stack up to 102% if that is included.  

There is not mention of water vapour in the list of " the most important greenhouse gases" in the above pages. Nor is it mentioned in the two pages that follow.

The above cartoon denies change on a number of levels:

It is not our planet that gets sick if we destroy the thermal balances that sustain us. Rather it is our mortality.

Blankets, like greenhouses work by reducing thermal convection. The atmosphere works by increasing thermal convection i.e. increasing the rate of change as its level of thermal energy increases

New Zealand is part of the problem, not isolated in an oasis of blue and green (cool) as portrayed. New Zealander's industrial processes (pastoral farming, burning forests, use of fossil fuels etc) over the last 150 years have contributed to the impact of human activities on global thermal balances and any human-induced changes to them.

 

The page states that to reduce what it calls "greenhouse gas emissions we need to think about conserving (using less) energy and being more energy efficient (using energy wisely.)" This is confused and impossible. The confusion stems from the denial of the Principles of Energy. The wise use of energy or energy efficiency is about the careful use of resources (energy forms, not about the amount of energy we use. The critical issue is that environmental balances are sustained by our use.

 

Return to presentation to NZ Minister of Energy & Climate Issues

Return to Update Page

Return to the Welcome Page